A Perspective of Fiction & Non-Fiction

What would naan bread be if it were spelled noon bread? Would it be considered bread taken at noon or just bread? Or is bread just bread, simply different varieties? Would one argue that it is just bread and bread is just simply bread with different types of bread? But one could also argue that all breads are different. Even the times of day the bread is taken. Another one could argue is that you need bread to get bread. Is one’s bread really another one’s piece of bread? Ponder how we read and interpret what we take bread to be. Simple at first glance yet looking at it is not one's first instinct.

Is non-fiction not real literature or is fiction not real without the “non”? One can ponder this thought since one learned how to read. If “non” is most often associated with what is not, why do we consider non-fiction real and fiction fantasy? Is there a deeper meaning or is that simply the unjustifiable meaning one could argue in a discussion? Is that the right for one’s perspective and the others for another’s perspective? The perspective of another’s perspective is arguably just a perspective of another’s point of view. Is that point of view another’s correct perspective? Is one's own perspective an acceptable point of view to another’s perspective or is there only one right perspective and the other point of view wrong? Perspectives of perspectives to each their own both or all to one or absolutely none is up for debate. Naan-sense. ☀